Ségolène Royal & the 2012 Presidentials

To my surprise, Ségolène Royal has, at least on the surface “put personal ambition aside to enable a united left.”

She claimed that she would not decide to stand alone, but would instead consult with the other main leaders of the Parti Socialiste in France, namely the Chief Secretary (leader) Martine Aubry and Dominique Strauss-Kahn, probably the best man for the job of taking out a gravely weakened Sarkozy in 2012.

 Ségolène Royal & the 2012 Presidentials

On the one hand, I certainly hope it is true that she will not stand, as she is loved by some and hated by others. Personally I do not think she is the right candidate; she lost to Sarkozy in 2007 and her stock has not increased since then. Just looking at the Regional Election results, it becomes clear that the Socialists can take control of the presidency provided, as I have often said, that they can get their act together. For this, Royal is far too divisive.

It should thus be a simple task to choose the best candidate for taking on an, shall we say, emasculated, president. Royal is categorically not the right person as she does not command a broad enough coalition of support outside of her own cult within the PS. Aubry has had a much improved reputation in the media since the Regional success, but she just isn’t presidential material.

Imagine, if you will, a reverse of 2002; in the second round, instead of the UMP candidate and the Front National, we see a match between the Socialist and the Fascist.

This Post Has 1 Comment

  1. Xavier F says:

    You are right that Royal is not the proper person for ousting Sarkozy. In fact the big problem is that there is currently *nobody* really credible for the job, whether on the right or on the left (and don't count DSK as a real opponent: he widely contributed to the defeat of Ségolène Royal and got his position at the IMF as a reward).

Leave A Reply